New -- Social Golfer Combinations
Master of Your Own Game
The focus of this newsletter, and the
entire Probable Golf Instruction site, is to enable the golfer to
have the lowest possible average score by making the best club selection
on each shot. In short, it is to make you as a golfer the "Master
of Your Own Game."
Each golfer is limited physically by his/her swing and short game,
but can shoot lower scores without making physical improvements
by improving the mental aspect of the game, of which there are many
facets. This newsletter deals with an aspect often neglected by
players and teachers alike; how to make better choices on the course
based on ability. The foundation of the ideas presented here are
based on pure physics and mathematics using the latest scientific
Try out my new Driver
Distance Calculator. Change temperature, clubhead speed, loft,
energy and see how far the ball goes.
Get a copy of my latest
study. A statistical
analysis of over 1600 scores of golfers handicaps 0 - 36.
Graphs and charts display the data.
The scores were used to simulate
over 140 000 matches.
analysis of those matches
Do the holes on your course have a fair handicap
difficulty ranking? Are there some holes you rarely win? Find
out how to calculate the actual difficulty of your holes. Check
Hole Difficulty Ranking
This newsletter goes beyond "course
management". It quantifies what one needs to improve course
management that leads to lower scores.
Consider a 400 yd par 4 like the one
in the graphic below. From the tee there are trees right and trees
and water left. Too long of a tee shot will end up on a downhill
slope. To have a flat lie, the drive tee shot should be not more
than 250 yds. On the second shot, water guards the most of the green
in front and trees guard the right and the rear. Left of the green
is out-of-bounds. The pin is on the left rear of the green.
Where should the golfer play his/her
shots? It all depends on the ability of the player. Tiger Woods
obviously has the most options open to him but he will play the
hole in a way that gives him the best chance at the lowest score
on the hole.
A 15 handicapper will play the hole differently and
will score higher, but there is an optimum way to play the hole.
Not every 15 handicapper should play the hole in the same way either;
it all depends on the strengths and weaknesses of the player's game.
It depends upon the player's shot patterns (where he hits various clubs, distance and precision). Many golfers
have higher handicaps because of poor club choices, not poor physical
As an example, let's say a 15 handicap
can hit a driver on average 250 yds (so he doesn't need to worry
about hitting too long and having a downhill lie on the second shot)
but only hits 50% of the fairways. He can hit a 3-wood 225 yds and
hit 70% of the fairways. His shot pattern with the driver is to
hit 40% of his shots right and 10% left. His shot pattern with the
3-wood is to hit 20% left and 10% right. Which is the best choice?
The mathematical laws of probability
can be used to determine the likely results based on past performance.
Let's say a tee shot to the right adds
an average of 0.5 strokes to the score because of being in the rough
and/or in the trees. A tee shot ending in the water would add 1.0
stroke due to a penalty. If the player uses a driver, it would be
expected that 50% of the time he would be laying 1 (in the fairway),
40% of the time he would be right laying 1.5 and 10% of the time
he would left in the water laying 2 (dropping with a penalty). On
average the expected score after the tee shot would be:
0.50*1.0 + 0.40*1.5 + 0.10*2.0 = 0.50
+ 0.60 + 0.20 = 1.30 strokes
Likewise, with a 3-wood, the expected
score would be:
0.70*1.0 + 0.10*1.5 + 0.20*1.5 = 0.70
+ 0.15 + 0.30 = 1.15 strokes
The 3-wood would yield 0.15 fewer strokes,
partially due to the improved accuracy of the 3-wood and the fact
that the water on the left is not reachable with a 3-wood. If the
same situation occurred on all 18 holes in a round, that would be
2.7 strokes less using a 3-wood. Of course, using a 3-wood would
leave a longer second shot so the total score on the hole would
be determined by his shot patterns
for clubs he might hit on his second shot. A driver would leave
him 150 yd and thus a 7-iron and a 3-wood would leave him 175 yd
and thus a 5-iron. Let's say he hits 50% of greens when hitting
a 7-iron and 40% when hitting a 5-iron. When missing a green he
takes 2.9 more stokes (a total of 3.9 including the shot to the
green) and when hitting a green he takes 2.4 more strokes (a total
of 3.4). Using a driver followed by a 7-iron would yield:
1.30 + 0.50*3.4 + 0.50*3.9 = 1.30 +
1.7 + 1.95 = 1.30 + 3.65 = 4.95
Using a 3-wood following by a 5-iron
1.15 + 0.40*3.4 + 0.60*3.9 = 1.15 +
1.36 + 2.34 = 1.15 + 3.70 = 4.85
So, even though the number of strokes
used on the 2nd shot is higher with a 5-iron (3.70), the lower number
of strokes with the 3-wood yields and total of 0.10 strokes total
lower (1.8 strokes for 18 such holes). This, of course assumes a
certain short game ability and where the approach shot is aimed
based on the pin position. For more on approach shot statistics,
click on this link.
For a player to know how to best play
a hole, he must know his shot pattern. Too often golfers take risky
shots because they have made successful ones in the past. More often
than not, high scores result and then another aspect of the game
kicks in; controlling your emotions.
If you would like to have your precise
shot pattern determined, you can collect 10 rounds of statistics
and email them to me. I'll do an analysis for you and send you
the results. Or you can purchase a year's subscription for only
$15.99 Canadian. You just continue to send me your stats and I'll
determine your shot pattern and make recommendations. See a sample
Purchase a year's subscription.
If you have any questions or comments,
feel free to email
me at email@example.com
Instruction, Ken Tannar 2001-2015. All Rights Reserved.
Langley, B.C. V2Y 2G4 Canada
Phone: 604-309-7030 FAX: to fax, email an attachment
firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com